The twin cities in the state of Minnesota are proof that rivals can stay together and use the rivalry to improve one’s potential. For a very long time, the rivalry between the Twin Cities focused on pulling the other city down. There was a time in the nineteenth century when an architect or a professional practicing in one part of the city was not permitted to do business in the other.
Architects were specially targeted because there still remains a significant difference between Minneapolis and St. Paul. The latter has focused on conserving its Victorian heritage while the former has absorbed modernity and has gone in for style and glitz over tradition.
The presence of two stadiums in the twin cities is a proof of the intense rivalry that existed. The two cities competed for a separate Major League Baseball franchises and it was probably the only instance in the history of MLB that franchises were awarded to two cities situated so close together.
Like two twins fighting through their adolescent years, the early fifties saw the teams fail to come up with a mutually acceptable timetable for their games. So much so that the teams were in a position to play other teams arriving from long distances but were not prepared to host the other team which was situated just half a city away.
The early sixties saw both cities adopting a proactive and progressive approach. The city is united on the sports fund and the teams started sporting the name Minnesota instead of St. Paul and Minneapolis. This continued until Twin Cities became the nomenclature for all teams from the state of Minnesota.
After fighting with each other to establish superiority, the twin cities have finally realized that adopting a live and let live approach makes more sense. It is befitting the moralistic approach that has often been identified with the state of Minnesota.









